IELTS Writing Practice 2

Nowadays, a large number of advertisements are aimed at children. Some people think this brings some negative effects and should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?


Stepping into the new generation of entertainment, the TV advertisement never fails to draw people's attention. Recently an ongoing debate which has become the center of controversy goes like this: "The TV commercials for children ought to be prohibited as they are detrimental to the mental development of kids." In my view, the advertisement on television is beneficial to us more than disadvantage.


First of all, with the information from TV advertisement, people are able to acquire the knowledge of latest goods. Particularly in contemporary world, businessmen are always persuading the their target clients to purchase. And children are one the critical customers by all means, while the one who pay usually are their parents. Among the TV advertisement, most of them concerned with educational purpose. Not only can children be informed of favorable contents, but parents are able to join the growth of their kids.


Nonetheless, there is an increasing number of TV advertisement aimed at children that can lead to addiction, such as fast food, therefore result in an unhealthy life. In addition, by the influence of amazing screen effects, children tend to demand parents buying toys or food showed on TV for them, developing an overconsumed behavior sequentially, which can affect their mind after growing up.


In summary, the TV advertisement for children is not necessary to be completely banned, but need to be under scrutiny of the authorities. With the cautious examination, it ends up children can enjoy a happy and healthy childhood.


  

IELTS Writing Practice 1

IELTS 20111031:

The environment problems facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment.

Stepping into the new millennium, the environmental issue never fails to attract people's concern. Recently an ongoing debate which has become the center of controversy goes like this: "who is responsible for the environmental preservation: the authority, the enterprise, or the individual? In my view, these three perspectives are equally crucial.(inextricably intertwined)

It is an indisputable fact that the authority plays an important role in protecting the environment. With all the revenues contributed by taxpayers, government is capable of engaging great projects to improve our environment, such as urban renewal, water preservation, resource recycling... Furthermore the authority has the power to manipulate the environmental protection laws and regulations, and punish those who contaminated our living spaces.

On the other hand, the responsibility of enterprise should not be neglected. It is commonly believed that the majority of pollution comes along with the production process from each factory. Our land is suffering from the detrimental substance while the corporations making profits, which is absolutely intolerable. The corporations should therefore realize the benefit of being friendly to the environment. By doing so, corporation can not only prompt self-image, but to build the mouth reputation from consumers.


Meanwhile, some may argue that there is little individuals can do to save our planet. However, if everyone is willing to act, then the power of seventy billion people can be massive, thus the influence. The behavior of environment conservation can range from turning off lights after use, depleting less resource...etc. 


To conclude, I believe by coordinating and cooperating the endeavors of government, large companies and ordinary people, the green world will be in just around the corner.